SUMMARY OF THE CASA MEETING WITH VILLA CHARITIES ON JUNE 1, 2017
CASA member Ian MacDonald opened the meeting by saying the plans for the new Columbus Centre had not been well received by members and it had forced members to join with the larger outside community against any development of the lands for private profit.
Villa Charities, new Chief Executive Officer, Anthony Di Caita took exception to those who used the athletic facilities being called members. He said they were not members but were "consumers of a product" and that the Columbus Centre was a vendor and the 4,000 consumers were just clients with no greater right to participate in or control the destiny of the vendor than any other supplier of services they might purchase.
DiCaita then described how expensive it was to operate such an "old facility" and that the joint venture with the school was an opportunity to share resources and lower operating cost. He was unable to identify a similar joint school/community centre facility.
DiCaita confirmed that all new directors of Villa Charitiess were appointed by existing directors. He said that Villa Charities had no obligation to report on their decisions to their "customers" or to anyone else since they take no money from the government or any other outside organization.
CASA member, Angelo Scioscia, a former teacher said there would be a culture clash between the seniors in the Columbus Centre and the incoming high school students. He asked how they would be segregated. DiCaita gave an unclear picture as to how this would be accomplished. DiCaita described a triple gym on the school side and fitness equipment on the Columbus side and how separate times to use these facilities would be agreed on for each parties use. He confirmed that they would no longer offer health club facilities with all its special offerings.
CASA member, Lawrence Pincivero, asked if they were now short of funds, why were there no fundraising events like the Columbus Centre used to hold, and he had been active in, when the Columbus Centre was being built 40 years ago? No answer was provided.
DiCaita confirmed that the school board would be buying the Columbus Centre property from Villa Charities because they did not have the $50,000,000 required to build the new facility on their own. They would then become a tenant in the new property.
He also pointed out that the sale could not go through unless certain conditions were met. It was confirmed that no temporary facility had yet been located. (Note: As of October 8, 2017 a temporary facility has still not been identified nor does CASA expect such a facility will ever be located.)
During the meeting he reported the interesting fact that only 20% of the Columbus Centre members were over the age of 64.
This was an unproductive meeting. Villa Charities sees little need to alter their course or compromise. They were intent upon selling us on their objectives without having any benefits or features of interest to the CASA representatives.
The following are the questions we had hoped would be answered. They are questions that we ask you to raise at every opportunity when meeting with Villa Charities board members. Please bring to our attention any other questions you think should be asked.
QUESTIONS FOR VILLA CHARITY BOARD MEMBERS
1. Why construct a new Columbus Centre at this time?
2. What other options were considered?
3. Why were the rezoning plans submitted to the city before they were completed?
4. Why were the plans rejected by the city?
5. Why is a joint venture with the school necessary?
6. Who are the developers most actively involved in this proposed construction?
7. Why is Villa Charities allowed to operate behind a curtain of secrecy if the government has, over the years, aided them with millions of dollars in taxpayers money?
8. Which board members voted to proceed with the construction of this new joint facility?
9. When was the vote taken to proceed with this construction?
10. How was the community consulted and informed before the vote was taken.
11. Was the inconvenience to the 4,000 members and tenants of the assisted senior apartment buildings (owned by Villa Charities) taken into consideration?
12. Why were the elderly tenants of the assisted senior apartment buildings not informed of the proposed construction until May 2017?
13. Why does the new proposed roadway plan show access for more than 2,000 condo units?
14. Why did the Archdiocese in 2015 plan on having the church torn down by 2020?
15. Why has Cardinal Collins now said the church will never be torn down during its 50 year lease?
16. How was the public informed of this important issue by the school board before the vote?
17. Is the lawyer handling the OMB submission for Villa Charities aware that the community was not consulted about the plan before the submission was made to the city?
18. Why do the plans show no squash courts, raquetball courts, tennis courts, whirlpools, men's Health Club steam room, TV lounges, small Health Club gyms, seperate saunas for men and women and dedicated small lockers for every member?
19. Is it proposed that students will share locker space with Columbus Centre members?
20. Why would the development be announced before suitable temporary quarters were established?
21. Why are none of the 4,000 Columbus Centre members on the board?
22. Why are Villa Charities board members not nominated and elected by users of Villa Charities facilities?
23. How many and which boards, under the Villa Charities umbrella, and how many of their directors, were involved in the decision to demolish the Columbus Centre?
24. Why is CASA not allowed to distribute its notices and post them on bulletin boards in the Columbus Centre?
25. Which directors have conflicts of interest in the proposed construction?
26. Why have Villa Charities opted to go to the OMB before the city has had a chance to debate the the zoning changes?
27. Why does Villa Charities oppose making the Columbus Centre an official heritage site?
28. How many parking spots will members lose between 5 AM and 10 PM on week days?
29. How will parking for catered events at the Columbus Centre be handled?
30. How many spots will be shared with the school during weekdays?
31. What body will arbitrate disputes between the school and the Columbus Centre.
32. How will the elderly tenants in senior apartment buildings safely access the green space during and after the construction?
TORONTO STAR By Angelo Persichilli, Politics
Mon., Aug. 14, 2017
heated dispute is brewing in the Italian-Canadian community about the
future of the Columbus Centre in North York, the most iconic symbol of
Italian immigration after Pier 21 in Halifax.
The controversy is
not just about a structure that will be torn down and replaced with
something that has still to be completely defined. The dispute goes
beyond the Italian-Canadian community and involves two visions of how
cultural heritage should be protected.
Villa Charities, which
runs the Columbus Centre, is a non-profit organization that runs many
activities and structures built with both public and private money in
the Toronto area. For the last half century it has showcased activities
to promote Italian and Italian-Canadian culture and business —
everything to do with so-called “Italianità.” There’s social housing,
sports facilities, a senior’s home, restaurants, a daycare, and an art
The historic symbol of this activity is the Columbus
Centre at Dufferin St. and Lawrence Ave. W., with its well-known
The plan put forward by Villa Charities calls for
demolition of the Columbus Centre and construction of new facilities
that will include a high school and theatre. Cost of the operation will
be over $70 million, financed equally by Villa Charities and the Toronto
Catholic District School Board.
The school board will contribute
money from the provincial government, while Villa Charities will sell
almost three acres of the dozen acres it now owns. In the end, the board
will own the new structure while Villa Charities will get a long-term
lease to co-use the facilities.
Critics accuse Villa Charities of
unnecessarily destroying a symbol of Italian-Canadian history and
leaving many unanswered questions about the future of the entire
Villa Charities argues that the existing buildings, which date from 1980, need expensive restructuring that it cannot afford.
You might be interested in
Of course, there are many details missing about the project. But from what is known now, it deserves to be opposed.
First, Villa Charities has failed to prove that there are no alternatives to the proposed project.
Second, nobody embarks on such deep changes without appropriate consultation with stakeholders.
Third, a public organization can’t sign agreements first and give the details after.
this lack of openness is just a mistake, the organization has created a
public relations disaster from which it will be hard to recover.
serious procedural failings have increased suspicion about the real
scope of the plan and raised concerns about the future of the centre.
Critics fear it will lose its major symbolic structure and end up with a
fragmented ownership. If the Columbus Centre can go now, everything can
go in the future, at the whim of the board of the day.
heritage is not just about providing a stage for tarantella dancers or
presenting a fashion show. Heritage is also about symbols that remain
for future generations to see. The Columbus Centre and la Rotonda have
been the place where presidents, prime ministers, artists and painters
have paid tribute to Italian entrepreneurship and ingenuity in Canada.
Many in the community have celebrated weddings and family anniversaries
there, creating a cultural bond with the place and among each other.
are remembered for their history but also for the presence of symbols
like the Colosseum, built 2,000 years ago. We defend Casa Loma, built
“only” a century ago, because it’s part of Canadian history. Tearing
such structures down to build something economically more appealing
without presenting real alternatives is a sign of cultural laziness. Or
just part of an aggressive business plan designed to set the stage for a
future housing development.
The Columbus Centre isn’t Casa Loma
or the Colosseum and was built less than half a century ago, but the
concept is the same. A key part of the cultural and social commitment of
a community organization like Villa Charities must be to defend the
symbols of the community. The project put forward for the Columbus
Centre doesn’t do that. A leasing agreement is good only until the
leadership of the organizations change.
If these principles are
compromised, the entire area will be at risk of losing its original
purpose. It may end up as just another residential area with high-priced
An Italian politician once said that doubting people is a sin, but most of the time you are right on the mark.
Until those doubts are removed, the provincial government has a duty to stop this plan.
Angelo Persichilli is a freelance journalist and a former communications director for Prime Minister Stephen Harper.